(Editorial) In the suggested paragraph, the urgent matter (revising 3484 and 3513) is presented as following from the less significant matter expressed in the first two sentences. I would put it like this:
References to site local addresses should be removed as soon as practical from Default Address Selection for Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6) [RFC3484] and from the revision of Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Addressing Architecture [RFC3513]. Incidental references to site local addresses should be removed from other IETF documents if and when they are updated. These documents include [RFC2772, RFC2894, RFC3082, RFC3111, RFC3142, RFC3177]. Julian >-----Original Message----- >From: Christian Huitema [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 11:27 AM >To: Bob Hinden; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Cc: Brian E Carpenter >Subject: RE: SL deprecation draft > > >So, what about a text such as: > >Several IETF documents mention site local addresses [RFC2772, RFC2894, >RFC3082, RFC3111, RFC3142, RFC3177]. These mentions should be >removed if >and when these documents are updated. In particular, the references to >site local addresses should be removed from the revision of the Default >Address Selection for Internet Protocol version 6 [RFC3484] >and from the >revision of the Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Addressing >Architecture [RFC3513]. > >-- Christian Huitema -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
