> What do you mean by "omitted 'two-hour' rule"? KAME implements the > two-hour rule just as specified in RFC2462 with one exception: > omitting the following part of 5.5.3 e) > > 2) If ...(snip) and the > received Lifetime is less than or equal to StoredLifetime, > > since this condition is "logically redundant" as already discussed in > the wg.
It's my fault. I said what you say... and I may lost track of this point. Danel -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
