On 2004-02-27, JINMEI Tatuya / [EMAIL PROTECTED]@C#:H wrote: > "Nick 'Sharkey' Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > > I'm also dubious about relying on votes at IETF meetings for > > technical issues ... because often an option which seems 'obvious' > > at the time actually isn't once the drafts have been considered > > in detail. And most of the WG attendees won't have considered > > them in detail before the meeting. Sad but true. > > (I know this is not a technical discussion, so I'll try to refrain > myself from making further posting on this particular point. But feel > free to respond to this message, of course)
Nah, I'll quit my whinging. > Let's just recall the recent site-local discussions... No, please, let's just not! :-) (If I go suddenly silent on this issue for a while, I'm not sulking, I'm flying ...) -----Nick -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
