On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Ralph Droms wrote: > Is there interest in expending any more of the IETF's resources > reopening a problem for which we have rough consensus on a solution, > published specifications and running code?
You say that carefully, but still giving an impression as if rough consensus had been gauged that only one solution would be specified -- otherwise there would not be "reopening" the problem. That has never been even raised (AFAIR); I'd certainly have objected. The fact that there is a solution out there, which fits the needs of some users, does not mean that there can not (or should not) be a different kind of solution which would seem to be much more appropriate in some other scenarios or for some other users. -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
