>>>>> On Mon, 19 Apr 2004 10:48:07 -0700,
>>>>> Alain Durand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I agree with Jim, section 5.5.2 should be deleted. Let implementations
> decide
> what to do if there is no router.
> If you decide to keep 5.5.2, you will need to add some text to analyze
> the performance impact of doing DHCPv6 when there is no IPv6 at all.
Jim and Alain, thanks for the input. I'll go back to this thread when
we complete the bigger one about the M/O flags (because the result
will be likely to affect this issue as well).
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
