> Well, I for one would rather leave the entire handling of the Managed flag > to the to-be-written RFC. I see the point of assuming that the flag will be > visible through some kind of API for the DHCPv6 process, but I would rather > not build a dependency to another document.
I'm certainly not implying any API. Why do you think the text with the forward reference to "a separate document" implies any API? Erik -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
