This text is fine with me, too.
- Ralph
At 09:43 AM 5/21/2004 -0700, Erik Nordmark wrote:
> Or, if you feel happier by mentioning changes of the M bit explicitly, > we could alternatively say > > The details of how a host uses the M flag, including any use of > the "on" and "off" transitions for this flag, to control the use > of DHCPv6 for address assignment will be described in a separate > document. > (based on a previous text from Ralph) > > This way, we can avoid the use of the "possibly extraneous state > variable" which is internal information in the implementation, while > keeping the essential idea about external behavior.
The text above is fine with me.
Erik
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
