OK. I agree too. thanks /jim
> -----Original Message----- > From: Erik Nordmark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 1:32 PM > To: Bound, Jim > Cc: Erik Nordmark; Christian Huitema; Ralph Droms; JINMEI > Tatuya / çæéå; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [rfc2462bis] relationship between M/O flags and > related protocols > > > Just checking. We do need the M bit for those wanting to use > > stateful? Or do you not agree? > > I agree with the Jinmei's definition that the M bit indicates > to the host that DHCPv6 for IP address configuration is > available on the link. > > With that definition it is possible to build hosts that > initialize efficiently, by only trying to use DHCPv6 when the > router advertisements say that it is available. > > Erik > > > DÅ ûúÂäx ®©¨¥x%Ëb¦þ¢z×è®