Stig Venaas wrote:
My thinking is:
M=0, O=0 stateless autoconf of addresses M=0, O=1 stateless autoconf of addresses + information-request M=1, O=0 stateful autoconf of addresses
It seems from these discussions that a more precise representation might be:
M=0, O=0 stateless autoconf of addresses M=0, O=1 stateless autoconf of addresses + information-request M=1, O=X stateful autoconf of addresses + information-request
where, X = "Don't-Care". Does this match up with the emerging consensus? Is there really nothing better to be done with the "O" bit when the "M" bit is set?
Thanks - Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
