Yes - there are 9 instances in the body and 1 in the abstract and non-local would be right for all these places I believe.
Regards,
Elwyn
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 19 August 2004 09:26
> To: Davies, Elwyn [HAL02:0S00:EXCH]
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2462bis-05.txt
>
>
> >>>>> On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 17:43:39 +0100,
> >>>>> "Elwyn Davies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> >> global address - an address with unlimited scope. From stateless
> >> address autoconfiguration's perspective, it essentially means
> >> an address that has larger scope than link-local.
>
> > That would help - but then 'unlimited' and 'larger scope
> than link-local'
> > are potentially contradictory (if unique local use actually
> happens - and
> > multicast has lots of scopes in theory).
>
> > Could we use:
> > non-local address - an address which has a larger scope
> than link-local.
>
> And are you suggesting replace "global address" with "non-local
> address" throughout the text?
>
> JINMEI, Tatuya
> Communication Platform Lab.
> Corporate R&D Center,
> Toshiba Corp.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
