Well put John I had forgotten about that. So Tim this answers a lot of your questions.
The bottom line is DHCPv6 is for stateful address configuration and a by product is prefix delegation. How the market uses that is not our concern we need to specify for both. /jim > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 6:27 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Stateful != M , Stateless != O > > Tim &Jinmei, > > > > But we need to be careful too in that the Node > Requirements draft is > > > just coming out of the oven and was baked using a different > > recipe :) > > > > That's perhaps true, though I don't think there will be a big gap > > between the description of the node-req document and > (future versions > > of) the M/O document. > > Node Requirements is just an informational document, so it > should not be considered Normative in any sense. If there is > a discrepancy between an informational and a PS/DS/FS then > the standard wins out. I don't think we really need to wory > about this. > > John > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
