All,
On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 15:18, Fred Templin wrote: > It wasn't specified, but the IPv6 layer should have reasonable > assurance that > the corruption occurred beyond the end of the header before sending > ICMPs. > It is hard to imagine the IESG allowing functionality this speculative to arrive in a specification that is recycling at DS. And for good reason. There is no chance that any functionality like this could get implementation reports sufficient to qualify for DS within three IETFs let alone within a couple of days or weeks. This work doesn't belong in this specification. It may not belong anywhere because of the issues cited by Perry. Tim Hartrick Mentat Inc. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
