Soliman, Hesham wrote:
FWIW I don't have a problem with ndproxy being published while incompatible with SeND. There are other examples of completely insecure experimental RFCs, e.g. Fast handoffs. It's essential to make the document consistent though.
what is being discussed is incompatibility between two protocols. not insecure experimental protocols. FWIW, draft-kempf-mobopts-handover-key-00.txt is tring to define how SEND can be used to create keys for fast handoffs.
Vijay
Hesham
> > That doesn't settle the issue of whether SEND and NDproxy are or
> are not incompatible, but I have no problem with the concept that
> a given (bridged) LAN can only run one of them.
> > Brian
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
=========================================================== This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient please contact the sender and delete all copies. ===========================================================
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
