On Fri, 18 Feb 2005, Erik Nordmark wrote:
With this, the ISP could prevent the user from running ND proxy, so implementations will likely have a knob which would ignore this bit, but still..

Since such an ISP would violate the "assign a /48 by default" recommendation, it might as well go all the way and only assign a /128 to the subscriber.
So why would the ISP use the more cumbersome approach of 1) assiging a /64, and 2) lying by setting the P-bit in its RA?

Because if such an ISP used RAs for address assignment, it couldn't restrict to /128. (Well, maybe such ISP's would require stateful DHCPv6 assignment..)


--
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to