Hi Alex, On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 13:58:44 +0100 Alexandru Petrescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brian Haberman wrote: > > > My experience with ethernet cards and drivers is that if they don't > > have multicast capability, they map MAC addresses with the group bit > > on to FF:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF prior to transmit. > > Yep but about the transmitter that _does_ have the multicast capability > and the receiver that does not have the multicast capability. > > > On the receive side, these cards would go into promiscuous receive > > mode and then filter at the device driver. > > Yes but what about cards that can't go into promiscuous receive mode. I > understand that promiscuous mode is probably the easiest way for a card > to do, but from my experience not all cards can do promiscuous mode. > Do you have examples of such hardware / chipsets ? I'd think it'd have to be really, really old not to have basic multicast and promiscous capabilities. I'd wonder about the value of introducing layer 2 broadcasts into IPv6 just to cater for such old and rare hardware. Regards, Mark. -- The Internet's nature is peer to peer. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------