>>>>> On Tue, 24 May 2005 10:04:25 -0400, >>>>> "Soliman, Hesham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hi all, > I submitted an updated revision of 2461bis which includes > the resolutions that were agreed on by the WG in the last meeting > (the SLLAO thread). It also includes fixes for the comments Tatuya > raised on the last version. > I think this draft is now ready for the IESG. I've not fully checked the entire new version, but from a quick glance the following comment of mine does not seem to be addressed: http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg04811.html http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg04818.html At the very least, the 4th paragraph of Section 7.2.5 needs an editorial fix for oddly short lines: If the target's Neighbor Cache entry is in the INCOMPLETE state when the advertisement is received, one of two things happen: If the advertisement were solicited, the state is changed to REACHABLE. Otherwise, the state is set to STALE. Note that the Override flag is -> ignored if the entry is in the -> INCOMPLETE state. JINMEI, Tatuya Communication Platform Lab. Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
