(Forgot to mention this)
>>>>> On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 11:43:45 +0100,
>>>>> Elwyn Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> It occurs to me that there is another issue related to one we have discussed
> for Neighbour Discovery: A node that implements the response side of name
> lookup has to join the relevant multicast groups that we are talking about and
> should send out the MLDv1 or MLDv2 listener messages to ensure that the
> multicast messages will reach it through any switches that happen to be in the
> way. Do implementors do this anyway?
I don't know how this is relevant to the particular point of the group
range, but anyway, yes, our implementation do that. And, I don't see
any reason why implementations don't do that: it seems pretty trivial
point to me.
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
p.s. (this is also forgotten in my previous response:-) it would be
nice if you could send your message in a plain text instead of html.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
