Hi, I was chatting with Keith Moore, and think that it may help to provide guidance (a BCP) on which components are stable and reliable for IPv6 deployment.
Perhaps it could be seen as a wrap-up for the IPv6 WG. It may be possible to indicate the standard levels at the time of writing, and indicate if there were known remanant issues (or uncertainty) with a particular protocol. This would give a clear idea of how far down the path to usability the suite of v6 tools is, so that operators can consider the state of the art before going ahead with deployment. Does anyone have an opinion on if it would be helpful or hurtful? Greg -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
