Jari Arkko wrote: ...
o Whether we actually want to define a secure approach to proxies. Here I'd personally be OK even with no security for proxying, as long as the above issues were corrected. But you could also argue the other way; the IETF usually does require mandatory-to-implement security mechanisms to go with its protocols.
I'd be a bit concerned if I could, for example, walk into my neighbour's apartment, hop to his wireless LAN, and find myself getting proxy ND from a third neighbour I'd never met, without some sort of AAA process. But for an Experimental draft we can't really insist on a solution - for me the question is whether the warnings are sufficient. Brian -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------