On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 02:36:16AM +0100, Daniel Roesen wrote: > Nevertheless, the significance of bits #57 and #58 are not widely > known to IPv6 operators out there.
I cannot count. g-bit is bit #56, not #58. My only excuse for this mail flood is that it's almost 3am local time here. :-Z My apologies. Best regards, Daniel -- CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0 -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
