On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 01:51:57PM -0700, Erik Nordmark wrote: > >So my preference would be to deprecate them since what we really would > >need is a n:m mapping table between process ids and transport endpoints. > > Any other comments? > > If not, how do we go about deprecating them?
On the technical side, there is a slight problem with deprecating udpEndpointProcess and tcpListenerProcess since these objects are the only readable column of the underlying tables and hence the whole table becomes not-accessible. And changing the MAX-ACCESS is not allowed by the SMIv2 rules - so we essentially would have to create new tables... /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder International University Bremen <http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/> P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
