>> Also, the subnet model that NetLMM WG wants to choose is to have >> a unique prefix for each MN. > Having a unique prefix for each MN is not the same as a requirement to perform prefix delegation. Netlmm hosts are required to work with existing stacks, and I would generally expect them to use SLAAC or DHCP in the normal manner. Just that the network advertises a different prefix for each mobile node, e.g., on the point to point link that the node is on. Details to be worked out, this is still work in progress.
I would also expect that Netlmm to not disturb other functions. So if someone wanted to deploy a Netlmm network with an additional prefix delegation via DHCP for mobile routers -- that should be possible. In short, I don't think Netlmm can be used as an argument for a new prefix delegation scheme. --Jari -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
