> Thanks for the quick e-mail. As one of the co-authors, I'd in > turn like to reply (and state that ICMPv6 PD is ANOTHER way > to do IPv6 PD, NOT a replacement for the existing mechanism). > FWIW, please see comments in-line:
This is probably the crux of the issue. I believe that having multiple IETF standardized ways to achieve the same thing is a bad idea. - Alain. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
