On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 09:28:21AM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 05:41:26PM +0100, > Pars Mutaf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > a message of 31 lines which said: > > > > Again, *read* draft-ietf-dnsext-mdns-47.txt, the use of unicast is > > > clearly possible (section 2.4). > > > > But it is still multicast DNS? > > I really do not understand you. Try in French :-) Because, obviously, > if it is unicast, it is not multicast :-)
unicast is a degenerative case of multicast. > Also, it is not really DNS, it is LLMNR (same packet format, many > similar concepts but a different protocol). LLMNR is not DNS mostly 'cause the IESG mandated it. one could easly see this as DNS on a different port#. --bill -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------