> > why, under $DIETIES green earth would you want to push a dead
> > technology? The IESG is dead-set against this.
>
> because the IESG has turned over N times during those 8 years, and the idea
> is still solid and useful and interesting, and the current proposed RFC is
> experimental, and most importantly, because the need for it will continue to
> resurface until we push it over the top of the hill and roll it down to the
> town.
sigh... let me ramp up here.
do you want the code (8.1.2 based and haq'ed into 9.3.1 ) or do you
want to
start fresh?
the text will be pumped out shortly.
--bill
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
