Pekka Savola wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Brian Haberman wrote:
>>     This is an update based on feedback received on the list and via
>> private e-mail.  Please review and comment.  I would still like to
>> solicit input on WG adoption.
> 
> Not sure what was the conclusion here, but I gave it a quick a read.

I am awaiting confirmation from Bob Hinden, but I see a consensus to
adopt this document and progress it to standards track.

> 
> My main comment is that Section 4 only specifies the behaviour of the
> EFO option (three MUSTs) on transmit.  The behaviour on receipt
> (particularly when those MUSTs are ignored) is unspecified.

Good catch.  I will add the following text to Section 4 to specify
receive behavior:

     - MUST ignore the option if it occurs in NDP messages other than
Router Advertisements

     - MUST only process the first occurrence of the option in a
received Router Advertisement

> 
> I believe also the RA Option Bit 55-56 under IANA considerations should
> be 54-55 (56 be off by one bít?).

Yes, they are off by one.  The experimental ones should be 54-55 and the
available for assignment ones should be 6-53.

Regards,
Brian

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to