Pekka Savola wrote: > On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Brian Haberman wrote: >> This is an update based on feedback received on the list and via >> private e-mail. Please review and comment. I would still like to >> solicit input on WG adoption. > > Not sure what was the conclusion here, but I gave it a quick a read.
I am awaiting confirmation from Bob Hinden, but I see a consensus to adopt this document and progress it to standards track. > > My main comment is that Section 4 only specifies the behaviour of the > EFO option (three MUSTs) on transmit. The behaviour on receipt > (particularly when those MUSTs are ignored) is unspecified. Good catch. I will add the following text to Section 4 to specify receive behavior: - MUST ignore the option if it occurs in NDP messages other than Router Advertisements - MUST only process the first occurrence of the option in a received Router Advertisement > > I believe also the RA Option Bit 55-56 under IANA considerations should > be 54-55 (56 be off by one bít?). Yes, they are off by one. The experimental ones should be 54-55 and the available for assignment ones should be 6-53. Regards, Brian -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------