Hi Jari, As an FYI: There is a need to indicate PMIP6 capability in the network via RA options. This is being proposed in I-D: draft-damic-netlmm-pmip6-ind-discover-01.txt
-Raj On 8/16/07 7:20 AM, "ext Jari Arkko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have made my AD review of this document and found no > issues. The document will be moved forward. > > By the way, note that the immediate need for this may be > less pressing now than a few months before. DNA WG > who was previously planning to use more bits is now > re-considering their solution for other reasons and > the new solution may not end up needing bits at all. > Also, I saw that the WGLC response came from just > a few persons. I'm not too happy about that but > perhaps it is acceptable in this case given that the > document is merely a maintenance update to provide > more space for future extensions. > > Jari > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
