I did not see any complaints, so given that Brian's new version is in the directories I will proceed with the approval.
Thanks, Jari Brian Haberman kirjoitti: > All, > The IESG reviewed the RA flags option draft and provided several > comments. In order to address those comments, I proposed the > following OLD/NEW edits to the document. I will submit a revised > version of the document to the ID editor soon. If you have issues > with the proposed changes, please let me know quickly. > > > > OLD: > Length = 1; The length MUST be checked when processing the option > in order to allow for future expansion of this option if the need > arises. > > NEW: > Length - The length MUST be checked when processing the option > in order to allow for future expansion of this option. An > implementation of this specification MUST set the Length to 1, > MUST ignore any unrecognized data, and MUST be able to recognize > the specified length in order to skip over unrecognized bits. > > > OLD: > During the construction/transmission, this option: > > o MUST only occur in Router Advertisement messages > > o MUST be the first option immediately following the Router > Advertisement message header > > o MUST only occur once in the Router Advertisement message. > > NEW: > During the construction/transmission, this option: > > o MUST only occur in Router Advertisement messages > > o MUST occur prior to any additional options associated with any > flags set in this option > > o MUST only occur once in the Router Advertisement message > > o MUST NOT be added to a Router Advertisement message if no flags > in the option are set > > o MUST have all unused flags set to zero. > > > OLD: > Upon reception, a receiver processing NDP messages containing this > option: > > o MUST ignore the option if it occurs in a message other than a > Router Advertisement > > o MUST ignore the option if it is not the first option in the Router > Advertisement > > o MUST ignore all instances of the option except the first one > encountered in the Router Advertisement message > > NEW: > Upon reception, a receiver processing NDP messages containing this > option: > > o MUST ignore the option if it occurs in a message other than a > Router Advertisement > > o MUST ignore all instances of the option except the first one > encountered in the Router Advertisement message > > o MUST ignore the option if the Length is less than 1 > > o MUST ignore any unknown flag bits. > > > OLD: > The bit fields within the option are numbered from left to right from > 8 to 55 and follow the numbering of the flag bits in the RA option > described in Figure 1. Flag bits 0 to 7 are found in the Router > Advertisement message header defined in [1] > > NEW: > The bit fields within the option are numbered from left to right from > 8 to 55 (starting at bit offset 16 in the option) and follow the > numbering of the flag bits in the RA option described in Figure 1. > Flag bits 0 to 7 are found in the Router Advertisement message header > defined in [1] > > > OLD: > The assignment of new RA flags in the RA option header and for the > bits defined in the RA extension option defined in this document > require standards action or IESG approval. > > > NEW: > The assignment of new RA flags in the RA option header and for the > bits defined in the RA extension option defined in this document > require standards action or IESG approval [RFC2434]. > > > Regards, > Brian > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
