Hi Folks, I read the latest version of the draft and it very clearly articulates the problem it is trying to address. Thanks for doing this. I have a few comments.
Section 1 ========= Change "The reception of a Prefix Information Option (PIO) with the L-bit set and a non-zero valid lifetime creates (or updates the valid lifetime for an existing entry) in the prefix list. " to "The reception of a Prefix Information Option (PIO) with the L-bit set and a non-zero valid lifetime creates an entry (or updates the valid lifetime for an existing entry) in the prefix list." Section 2 Steps 1-4 =================== It is not clear from the draft if steps 1-4 need to be followed by RFC2461 compliant hosts. My understanding is no, but feel free to correct me if I am wrong. Section 2 Step 5.3 ================== "When address resolution fails, the host SHOULD send an ICMPv6 Destination Unreachable message." Where should the node send this message. Isn't it enough to indicate to the requesting application that the destination is not reachable using some kind of indication? Cheers Suresh -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
