At Wed, 9 Jul 2008 12:21:06 -0400, "Hemant Singh (shemant)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Erik suggested some new text to us related to bullets 3 and 4 of on-link > definition in the Terminology section of RFC4861. He is busy this week - > we are sending this on his behalf. As you know bullet 4 is being debated > in 6man. Erik thinks even bullet 3 is suspect. We don't want such > suspect information to be lost in archived emails of 6man. So we added > the information to our draft. Please see the new paragraph from us: > > > The on-link definition in the Terminology section of > [RFC4861] > defines the complete list of cases where an address is > considered on-link. > Note, in particular, that Redirect Messages can also > indicate an address is off-link. > As of the writing of this document, bullets three and > four of the on-link > definition are being debated and may need further > clarification. > Individual address entries can be expired by the Neighbor > Unreachability > Detection mechanism. > > Please let us know if the new text works for you? This text works for me (although I guess these new sentences would be a very good target for the IESG to make a "discuss" comment - good luck:-). --- JINMEI, Tatuya Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
