Alex, Could you elaborate on that statement?
Best Regards, Jeffrey Dunn Info Systems Eng., Lead MITRE Corporation. (301) 448-6965 (mobile) -----Original Message----- From: Alexandru Petrescu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 10:00 AM To: Dunn, Jeffrey H. Cc: Jari Arkko; IETF IPv6 Mailing List; Sherman, Kurt T.; Ron Bonica; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Pasi Eronen; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; V6ops Chairs; Martin, Cynthia E. Subject: Re: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes? (was: v6ops-addcon and longer than 64 bit prefixes) Hi, Dunn, Jeffrey H. wrote: [...] > My basic question is: What basic engineering problem is solved by > proscribing non-64 bit prefixes? I don't know. But I know what problems are solved by using longer-than-64bit prefixes, especially when autoconfiguring addresses with stateless method. Alex ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________ -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
