On Wed, 21 Jan 2009, Christian Huitema wrote:
What did you have in mind? Is there a reason to advance it?
I am getting enquiries along the lines of "OK, this was a proposed
standard 5 years ago, it has not progressed, does it mean it is now
obsolete?"
FWIW, I wouldn't mind advancing it if there is significant new
evidence or experience to document at the same time. If not (perhaps
you were referring to this), just updating on the standards track and
keeping the document unchanged, doesn't seem to have that much point
given we need to put energy to other work as well.
Site-locals and ULAs is one area where I suspect our understanding of
the situation has improved, and will continue to improve. Timing the
update properly to gather that understanding is probably a good idea.
--
Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
