Im thinking one step further than the double routers. For example if these routers are not serviced by something at least the service type of a dedicated T1 to each router then they would be doing VPN. So there are more requirements that need to be met here to make OSPF a realistic option.
Thank you Marla -----Original Message----- From: Fred Baker [mailto:f...@cisco.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 2:59 AM To: Azinger, Marla Cc: IETF IPv6 Mailing List; draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-rou...@tools.ietf.org; draft-donley-ipv6-cpe-rtr-use-cases-and-r...@tools.ietf.org Subject: Re: Comments on IPv6 Prefix Subdelegation On Jul 28, 2009, at 11:39 AM, Azinger, Marla wrote: > 2. I have concern regarding the suggestions in section 2.3 Am I > interpreting this correctly that you are suggesting upstreams do OSPF > over VPN with residential customers? within their homes? No, I am suggesting that in a home that has more than one router, one might want an IGP, just like one does in other places. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
