Ack. Thanks for the answer.
Dino
On Aug 13, 2009, at 9:21 AM, Lars Eggert wrote:
Hi,
yes, because RFC2460 says "MUST use always" and the intent here is
to loosen that restriction for LISP and AMT.
(And I'm sure Noel will again call this "red-tape legalese", but the
fact is that this change revises the standing IETF consensus, and
there's a process for that.)
Lars
On 2009-8-13, at 18:24, Dino Farinacci wrote:
On 2009-8-11, at 19:55, Dino Farinacci wrote:
If we changed the text in the LISP draft from "MUST" to "MAY",
would
we still need to write the accompanying document to RFC 2460?
Maybe Lars can comment on this.
In my opinion, any change from the MUST in RFC2460 requires updating
RFC2460.
Lars
From my text I wrote above, if we changed from MUST to MAY *in the
LISP draft*, do we have to update RFC2460?
Dino
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
