> If the latter paragraph only should be executed, the address given > by rogue RA remains, right ?
My reading would be that on receipt of a 0-lifetime RA that only the second paragraph would be executed (lifetime timeout). However, all hosts receiving the 0-lifetime RA would then have to recompute the next-hop, which in /some/ cases may require sending a RS (which the rogue RA node would presumably hear and re-answer). (Of course I haven't verified this against any implementation :) -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
