Erik,
On 2009/11/10, at 10:43, Erik Kline wrote:
If the latter paragraph only should be executed, the address given
by rogue RA remains, right ?
My reading would be that on receipt of a 0-lifetime RA that only the
second paragraph would be executed (lifetime timeout).
Second to that.
However, all
hosts receiving the 0-lifetime RA would then have to recompute the
next-hop, which in /some/ cases may require sending a RS (which the
rogue RA node would presumably hear and re-answer). (Of course I
haven't verified this against any implementation :)
I fail to get your point.
Requiring sending a RS leads to ... ?
Even if that RS fails, it does not have any effect on the given
addressby rogue RA, right ?
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
