> There is concern that this is an informational RFC. I don't understand that. Why would anyone care?
I do have one concern, though. It would be much better if the code fragments were clearly under the current regime (i.e. simplified BSD license from the IETF Trust). Apart from that, are there any major technical concerns that would justify an update? Regards Brian (P.S. I do think this is a very valuable RFC!) On 2009-12-05 10:46, Behcet Sarikaya wrote: > Hello 6manners, > We are hearing the news that RFC 4038 has started to be used by app > developers for IPv6 transition. See recent softwire discussions. > > There is concern that this is an informational RFC. I think that IETF can > reissue it as a BCP and 6man is probably the right place. > > Regards, > > Behcet > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
