> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: behave-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:behave-boun...@ietf.org] 代表
> marcelo bagnulo braun
> 发送时间: 2009年12月9日 21:24
> 收件人: Christian Huitema
> 抄送: beh...@ietf.org; Xu Xiaohu; ipv6@ietf.org
> 主题: Re: [BEHAVE] Reason(s) for Modified EUI-64 format to apply to ALL
> non-0::/3 IPv6 addresses ?
> 
> Christian Huitema escribió:
> >> At least the former usage has some certain applications. For example,
in
> >> case of NAT64, if a dual-stack host could distinguish synthesized IPv6
> >> addresses from native IPv6 addresses, it will not prefer a synthesized
IPv6
> >> address to an IPv4 address for initiating a communication with an IPv4
host.
> >>
> >
> > The well known prefix is easy to recognize, so there is no problem
there.
> For stateless, the design makes sure that the IPv4 translatable addresses
can
> be routed natively, which means there is no reason to not prefer them.
That
> leaves a pretty small domain of applicability for any scheme that would
reserve
> identifier patterns...
> >
> >
> In addition, in the NSP case, the host can configure the RFC3484 policy
> table to preffer native connectivity.

However, when one configures such a policy that native IPv6 connectivity
should be preferred to IPv4 connectivity. How could the dual-stack host
distinguish synthesized IPv6 addresses from native IPv6 addresses? If there
are some bits to tell whether it is an IPv4-embeded IPv6 address or not
(even which type of IPv4-embeded IPv6 address), the above issue can be
solved easily.

Xiaohu

> Regards, marcelo
> 
> 
> > -- Christian Huitema
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Behave mailing list
> > beh...@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave
> >
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Behave mailing list
> beh...@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to