Hi Jonathan,

I just re-read the draft I had written about 3 years ago and tried to
figure out things we could further add to your draft.

Do you have any diameter in the RPL network? If so there are 2 questions:

1. Is 255 a good enough value? With your draft we can allow only a
maximum of 255 intermediae nodes.
2. If we think a smaller value like 32/ 64 would be good enough, we
can further constrain the header to allow a maximum number of
addresses.

Thanks,
Vishwas

On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Jonathan Hui <j...@archrock.com> wrote:
>
> Vishwas,
>
> FYI, we currently have two initial 6man drafts that describe mechanisms for
> supporting RPL.  The concrete concerns about the routing header seem to
> apply to the rpl-routing-header draft rather than the rpl-option draft.
>
> To answer your question, we did intend to address the well-known traffic
> amplification issue with the check you suggested.  Section 2 already has
> initial text specifying that an IPv6 address must not appear more than once
> in the routing header.  In the next version of the draft, we'll include an
> update to Section 3 that verifies the requirement when processing the
> header.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Jonathan Hui
>
> On May 30, 2010, at 11:18 PM, Vishwas Manral wrote:
>
>> Hi Jonathan,
>>
>> I read your draft. As I have not read RPL I have to say the draft by
>> itself was not self contained so was a bit hard to figure out what can
>> be done in the RPL option.
>>
>> After finding the Traffic amplification issues, I had a draft
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-manral-ipv6-rh4-00 which had some
>> additional checks that could be required for any new RH header (we had
>> named it RH4 too).
>>
>> Though the scope is limited to LLN with RPL, I was wondering if the
>> issues known would not be an issue in such a network. If not so why?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Vishwas
>
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to