>-----Original Message----- >From: Vishwas Manral [mailto:vishwas.i...@gmail.com] >Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 3:07 PM >To: Hemant Singh (shemant) >Cc: Erik Nordmark; ipv6@ietf.org; culler Culler >Subject: Re: Fwd: I-D Action:draft-hui-6man-rpl-routing-header-00.txt
>Hi Hemant, >When we do IP in IP tunneling, in that case too the packet size >increases at an intermediate node. It is no different than this case. What intermediate node are we talking about for a tunneled packet? If the tunnel ingress point has followed RFC 2473, the packet goes to the egress without any MTU problems. See section 7-7.2 of RFC 2473. My recommendation is to focus the discussion to the operational issue that Erik raised and ascertain if the issue is a valid issue for the RPL network or not. I see David Culler has already replied to Erik. Hemant -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
