On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 11:56:56 -0400, Patrik Lahti wrote: > Thanks Hagen,
My pleasure! > Do I understand correctly then that it's essentially something that > should be configurable and that there are practical reasons for needing > to have the ability to configure it? If your or any other environment favor link local traffic by special egress queuing and/or switching and it is therefore advantageously - why not! The whole diffserv thing should not overrated. It is a clean and nice basis to classify packets and it is up to the environment to treat a packet special or not. The RFCs provides a standardized recommendation to achieve a consistent view. Not more and not less. > If so, what is your (and others') opinion on whether it should be > configurable per ND message type? And/or should DSCP be copied from the > invoking packet? First question: yes Seconds question: this is often a kernel-only-thing and I cannot estimate the whole impact. So: maybe. ;-) Cheers, Hagen -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------