On 2010-07-30 01:11, Michael Richardson wrote:
...
> If the ROLL WG does not feel conformtable with the above, then I think we
> need to go ask some grandfathers of IPv6... What's the FLOW LABEL FOR
> then?
That's the problem. It was never determined. That's why RFC 3697 had such
limited goals.
The introduction to draft-hu-flow-label-cases-00 gives a short summary
of the history.
>
> I think our usage of flow label is completely within the pervue of what
> was intended.
Can you summarise that use for those of us who don't follow ROLL,
and indicate how it plays with the rules in RFC 3697?
Thanks
Brian
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
