On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Thomas Narten <nar...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > Gawd, I love these sorts of discussions. > <snip> > And to be clear, I suspect we will not be approving any HBH options > any time soon. We know they are generally a bad idea. It is unlikely > that the reasons that HBH are a last resort approach will change > anytime soon. But can we please just leave things alone as they are > now? The possibility that a HBH may be defined in the future is not > something that is causing us problems today and needs fixing.
fair enough, though having some documented (at least in email) reasoning that "Oh, a new HBH will be cool!" is bad, certainly isn't bad, right? -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
