I am forgetting what the resolution was on the Hdr Options that were defined in the -01 version. I find those missing here, so i assume that they have been intentionally dropped out. I was personally in favor of those and didnt see too much harm in keeping them.
Other than the small nit above, the current version looks good. Kam On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 4:00 AM, <internet-dra...@ietf.org> wrote: > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is a work item of the IPv6 Maintenance Working Group of the IETF. > > > Title : An uniform format for IPv6 extension headers > Author(s) : S. Krishnan, et al. > Filename : draft-ietf-6man-exthdr-02.txt > Pages : 6 > Date : 2011-03-14 > > In IPv6, optional internet-layer information is encoded in separate > headers that may be placed between the IPv6 header and the transport > layer header. There are a small number of such extension headers > currently defined. This document defines a format for defining new > IPv6 extension headers. > > A URL for this Internet-Draft is: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-6man-exthdr-02.txt > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader > implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the > Internet-Draft. > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
