On 2011-03-28 08:53, Teemu Kiviniemi wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Mar 2011, teemu.savolai...@nokia.com wrote:
...
> I believe native IPv4 should always be preferred over NAT64.
That is just irrelevant and of no importance, since the only hosts
that use DNS64 and NAT64 in normal life are IPv6-only hosts.
There is a side issue of what happens if a synthetic IPv6 address
is referred to a non-IPv6-only host, but that is a whole other
problem that cannot be solved at the RFC3484bis level.
See draft-carpenter-referral-ps-02.txt...
Brian
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
