Multi-interfaced host might have one network interface IPv6-only with NAT64 (e.g. cellular) and another network interface IPv4-only (e.g. WLAN).
Teemu > -----Original Message----- > From: ext Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com] > Sent: 28. maaliskuuta 2011 07:55 > To: Teemu Kiviniemi > Cc: Savolainen Teemu (Nokia-MS/Tampere); beh...@ietf.org; ipv6@ietf.org > Subject: Re: RFC3484-revise and NAT64 Well-Known Prefix > > On 2011-03-28 08:53, Teemu Kiviniemi wrote: > > On Sun, 27 Mar 2011, teemu.savolai...@nokia.com wrote: > ... > > I believe native IPv4 should always be preferred over NAT64. > > That is just irrelevant and of no importance, since the only hosts > that use DNS64 and NAT64 in normal life are IPv6-only hosts. > > There is a side issue of what happens if a synthetic IPv6 address > is referred to a non-IPv6-only host, but that is a whole other > problem that cannot be solved at the RFC3484bis level. > > See draft-carpenter-referral-ps-02.txt... > > Brian -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
