-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Just read this thread. This is so great. Thanks to Thomas and all for the new text.
Seiichi (2011/05/14 8:32), Brian Haberman wrote: > All, > The chairs have determined that there is a strong consensus to > elevate DHCPv6 to SHOULD support in the node requirements document. > Since this is the last open issue with this document, the chairs will > begin the advancement process when a new version is published. > > Regards, > Brian & Bob > > On 5/13/11 7:21 PM, sth...@nethelp.no wrote: >>>> Per a previous thread, there are indications that the WG may now be >>>> willing to recommend that DHCPv6 be a SHOULD for all hosts. This is >>>> based on the following rationale: >>> >>> I support moving it to SHOULD. >> >> Agreed. >> >> Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sth...@nethelp.no >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list >> ipv6@ietf.org >> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32) iEYEARECAAYFAk3QbRsACgkQcrhTYfxyMkJyZwCfYnUcMHcKh4SCkqGsNOOJ7Zgl cyYAn0fXK5VUi+/1HxN21CDr6Tbr33i2 =hyQA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------