-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Just read this thread. This is so great.
Thanks to Thomas and all for the new text.

Seiichi

(2011/05/14 8:32), Brian Haberman wrote:
> All,
>      The chairs have determined that there is a strong consensus to
> elevate DHCPv6 to SHOULD support in the node requirements document.
> Since this is the last open issue with this document, the chairs will
> begin the advancement process when a new version is published.
> 
> Regards,
> Brian & Bob
> 
> On 5/13/11 7:21 PM, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
>>>> Per a previous thread, there are indications that the WG may now be 
>>>> willing to recommend that DHCPv6 be a SHOULD for all hosts. This is 
>>>> based on the following rationale:
>>>
>>> I support moving it to SHOULD.
>>
>> Agreed.
>>
>> Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sth...@nethelp.no
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>> ipv6@ietf.org
>> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32)

iEYEARECAAYFAk3QbRsACgkQcrhTYfxyMkJyZwCfYnUcMHcKh4SCkqGsNOOJ7Zgl
cyYAn0fXK5VUi+/1HxN21CDr6Tbr33i2
=hyQA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to