On May 13, 2011, at 11:34 , Cameron Byrne wrote: > On May 13, 2011 11:28 AM, "james woodyatt" <j...@apple.com> wrote: > > > > Mobile hosts SHOULD implement DHCPv6 clients. > > I wouldn't oppose elevating the requirement further still to say that > > mobile hosts MUST implement DHCPv6 clients. > > Why? Most mobile v6 nodes do not support it today. [...]
I was thinking about RFC 3775, section 11.5.2, which says: As described in Section 4, in order to form a new care-of address, a mobile node MAY use either stateless [13] or stateful (e.g., DHCPv6 [29]) Address Autoconfiguration. -- james woodyatt <j...@apple.com> member of technical staff, core os networking -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------