THanks Kerry and Brian,

Now we provide 3 parameters to our customers to configure a IPv6
address manually: 128bit address, subnet prefix and default gateway
(optional, if it is provided, it should be within the same subnet with
the 128bit address). Should we set subnet prefix to a fixed value 64
if the 128bit address starts with 001-111?
(ipv6 is a new feature in our appliance, we don't have much
experiences about it)
Thanks,
washam
PS: should we allow our customer configure 128bit address starting
with 000 in the first place?


2011/7/16 Kerry Lynn <[email protected]>:
> Brian, you're quite right.  I had in mind only one particular class of IID.
> Washam, see Appendix A of RFC 4291 regarding modified EUI-64 IIDs
> with "u"=0.  Also, RFC 3041 has been obsoleted; see RFC 4941 and
> its errata if privacy issues apply in your situation.
> -K-
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Brian E Carpenter
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> The authors of RFC 4291 chose not to use the upper case normative
>> keyword convention defined in RFC 2119. Therefore, 'required' means
>> what in means in plain English (i.e. REQUIRED in RFC2119ish).
>>
>>   Brian
>>
>> On 2011-07-15 19:03, Washam Fan wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I quoted this paragraph from RFC4291:
>> >
>> >    For all unicast addresses, except those that start with the binary
>> >    value 000, Interface IDs are required to be 64 bits long and to be
>> >    constructed in Modified EUI-64 format.
>> >
>> > But I am not sure how to interpret the text in  a correct way.
>> >
>> > If I assign an ordinary unicast address (except reserved anycast
>> > addresses mentioned in RFC5453) to an interface and the address
>> > doesn't start with 000, MUST the prefix be 64 bits? MUST the IID be
>> > constructed in Modified EUI-64 format?
>> >
>> > We are providing WebUI for our customer to manually assign IPv6
>> > addresses, we want to do hygiene check before the actual move.
>> >
>> > Thanks in advance
>> > washam
>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to