On 12/15/11 2:07 PM, Roger Jørgensen wrote: > On Dec 15, 2011 7:32 PM, "Brian Haberman" <br...@innovationslab.net> wrote: >> >> Hi Chris, >> Unfortunately, the draft is in a limbo state at this point. The WG >> Last Call ended about a month ago with zero comments or statements of >> support. The chairs cannot advance this document without some show of >> support by the community. >> >> I humbly request that members of the working group review this >> draft and post their comments, questions, and suggestions to the mailing >> list. > > Brian Carpenter said it all in this post: > > Message-ID: <4eb9d332.1040...@gmail.com> > Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 14:11:14 +1300 > From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com> > > <snip> > Reading this document as a proposed standard, I think it will confuse > the reader. I think that what we actually need is a 100% replacement > of RFC 3484, that can be read on its own. > </snip> >
Ah, you are correct. That message ended up in the wrong mailbox and I missed it when reviewing the state of the draft in response to Chris' query. Thanks, Roger. Brian -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
